Engaging healthcare professionals and patient representatives in the development of a quality model for hospitals: a mixed-method study

Author:

Bogaert Kathleen,Regge Melissa De12,Vermassen Frank34,Eeckloo Kristof15

Affiliation:

1. Strategic Policy Cell, Ghent University Hospital , Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent B-9000, Belgium

2. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organisation, Ghent University , Tweekerkenstraat 2, Ghent B-9000, Belgium

3. Management Department & Department of Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital , Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent B-9000, Belgium

4. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University , Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent B-9000, Belgium

5. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health, Ghent University , Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent B-9000, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Top-down and externally imposed quality requirements can lead to improvement but do not seem as sustainable as intended. There is a need for a quality model that intrinsically motivates healthcare professionals to contribute to quality and safe care in hospitals. This study shows how a quality model that matches the identity and the quality vision of the organization was developed. A multimethod design with three phases was used in the development of the model at a large teaching hospital in Belgium. In the first phase, 14 focus groups and 19 interviews with staff members were conducted to obtain an overview of the quality and safety challenges, complemented by a plenary discussion with the members of the patient advisory council. In the second phase, the challenges that had been captured were further assessed using a hospital-wide survey for all hospital staff. Finally, a newly established quality review board (with internal and external stakeholders) critically evaluated the input of Phases 1 and 2 and defined the basic quality standards to be implemented in the hospital. A first evaluation 2 years after the implementation was conducted based on (i) patients’ perceptions of quality of care and patient safety by publicly available indicators collected in 2016, 2019, and 2022 and (ii) staff experiences and perceptions regarding the acceptability of the new model gathered through (grouped) interviews and an open questionnaire. The quality model consists of eight broad themes, including norms for the hospital staff (n = 27), sustained with quality systems (n = 8), and organizational support (n = 6), with aid from adequate management and leadership (n = 6). The themes were converted into 46 standards. These should be supported within a safe, efficient, and caring work environment. The new model was launched in the hospital in June 2021. The evaluation shows a significant difference in quality and safety on different dimensions as perceived by hospitalized patients. The perceived added value of the participatory model is a better fit with the needs of employees and the fact that the model can be adjusted to the specific context of the different hospital departments. The lack of hard indicators is seen as a challenge in monitoring quality and safety. The participation of various stakeholders inside and outside the organization in defining the quality challenges resulted in the creation of a participatory quality model for the hospital, which leads towards a better-supported quality policy in the hospital.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards;Mukamel;Annu Rev Public Health,2014

2. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis;Panagioti;BMJ,2019

3. Deepening our understanding of quality in Australia (DUQuA): an overview of a nation-wide, multi-level analysis of relationships between quality management systems and patient factors in 32 hospitals;Braithwaite;Int J Qual Heal Care,2020

4. Is a hospital quality policy based on a triad of accreditation, public reporting and inspection evidence-based? A narrative review;Van Wilder;IJQHC,2021

5. Medicare and the joint commission on accreditation of healthcare organizations: a healthy relationship;Jost;Law & Contemp Probs,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3