Safety climate, leadership and patient views associated with hip fracture care quality and clinician perceptions of hip fracture care performance

Author:

Do Vu Quang1ORCID,Mitchell Rebecca1,Clay-Williams Robyn1,Taylor Natalie23,Ting Hsuen Pei1,Arnolda Gaston1,Braithwaite Jeffrey1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia

2. Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, 153 Dowling Street, Sydney, Woolloomooloo, NSW 2011, Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Hip fracture is a major public health concern for older adults, requiring surgical treatment for patients presenting at hospitals across Australia. Although guidelines have been developed to drive appropriate care of hip fracture patients in hospitals, data on health outcomes suggest these are not well-followed. Objective This study aims to examine whether clinician measures of safety, teamwork and leadership, and patient perceptions of care are associated with key indicators of hip fracture care and the extent to which there is agreement between clinician perceptions of hip fracture care performance and actual hospital performance of hip fracture care. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on a series of questionnaires used to assess hospital department- and patient-level measures from the Deepening our Understanding of Quality in Australia study. Data were analysed from 32 public hospitals that encompassed 23 leading hip fracture clinicians, 716 patient medical records and 857 patients from orthopaedic public hospital wards. Results Aggregated across all hospitals, only 5 of 12 of the key hip fracture indicators had ≥50% adherence. Adherence to indicators requiring actions to be performed within a recommended time period was poor (7.2–25.6%). No Patient Measure of Safety or clinician-based measures of teamwork, safety climate or leadership were associated with adherence to key indicators of hip fracture care. Simple proportionate agreement between clinician perceptions and actual hospital performance was generally strong, but few agreement coefficients were compelling. Conclusion The development of strong quality management processes requires ongoing effort. The findings of this study provide important insights into the relationship between hospital care and outcomes for hip fracture patients and could drive the design of targeted interventions for improved quality assurance of hip fracture care.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Australian and New Zealand hip fracture registry;Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry Group,2020

2. Poor adherence to guidelines in treatment of fragile and cognitively impaired patients with hip fracture: a descriptive study of 2,804 patients;Frandsen;Acta Orthop,2021

3. Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Urimubenshi;Eur Stroke J,2017

4. Does achieving the best practice tariff improve outcomes in hip fracture patients? An observational cohort study;Oakley;BMJ Open,2017

5. Administrative data feedback for effective cardiac treatment: affect, a cluster randomized trial;Beck;JAMA,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3