Measuring patient voice matters: setting the scene for patient-reported indicators

Author:

de Bienassis Katherine1,Kristensen Solvejg2,Hewlett Emily1,Roe David3,Mainz Jan4,Klazinga Niek1

Affiliation:

1. Health Division, OECD, 2 Rue Andre Pascal, Paris 75016, France

2. Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Moelleparkvej 10, Aalborg 9000, Denmark

3. Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy Ave 199, Haifa 3498838, Israel

4. Department South, Psychiatry Region Nordjylland, Moelleparkvej 10, Aalborg 9000, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background Achieving people-centred health care systems requires new and innovative strategies to capture information about whether, and to what degree, health care is successful in improving health from the perspective of the patient. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) can bring some of these new insights, and are increasingly used in research, clinical care, and policymaking. Methods This paper reflects the ongoing discussions and findings of the OECD PaRIS Working Group on Patient-reported Indicators for Mental Health Care. Results The OECD has been measuring quality of care for mental health conditions over the last 14 years through the Health Care Quality and Outcomes (HCQO) program; nonetheless, information on how persons with mental health problems value the services they receive, and impact of the services, remains limited. As of 2018, a survey from the OECD showed that only five of the twelve countries surveyed (Australia, Israel, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom) reported PROMs and PREMs collection on a regular basis in mental health settings. The paper details some of the challenges specific to the collection and use of PROMs and PREMs in mental health care, and examples from countries which have implemented comprehensive programmes to gather information about PROMs and PREMs for individuals receiving mental health services. Conclusions Given the health and economic impact of mental ill-health across all OECD countries, there is significant value to being able to assess the quality and outcomes of care in this area using internationally-comparable measures. Continued international harmonisation of PROMs and PREMs for mental health through international coordination is a key way to facilitate the sharing of national experiences, promote the use of PROMs and PREMs, and create meaningful indicators for national and international benchmarking.

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference10 articles.

1. Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series – paper 8: patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records can inform clinical and policy decisions;Ahmed;J Clin Epidemiol,2017

2. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators;Carinci;Int J Qual Health Care,2015

3. Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services;Robert;BMJ,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3