A qualitative study exploring challenges and solutions to negotiating goals of care at the end of life in hospital settings

Author:

Devery Kim12,Winsall Megan1,Rawlings Deb12

Affiliation:

1. Palliative & Supportive Services, Flinders University , Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia

2. Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University , Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Negotiating goals of care (GoC) with patients is an essential skill for all health-care professionals (HCPs) in hospitals. End-of-Life Essentials (EOLE) is a Commonwealth-funded project that delivers free, peer-reviewed, evidence-based, online education and practice change resources. To date, around 26 000 doctors, nurses and allied health professionals have registered to access the education. ‘Planning End-of-Life Care—Goals of Care’ features in the suite of EOLE modules and includes education around negotiating GoC with patients and families. Objective The aim of the study was to explore the views of module learners (HCPs) on challenges they have faced when negotiating GoC at the EOL with patients and families. Methods Participants were learners (HCPs) who registered to the EOLE website and engaged with the GoC module. Learners’ responses to the question posed at the end of the module ‘What are the hardest or most challenging things about negotiating GoC with patients and families?’ were extracted for a 12-month period. Qualitative data were analysed thematically in NVivo V.12, guided by the theoretical framework of pragmatism. An open, inductive approach was used to code the data, with axial coding used to refine and organize themes and subthemes. Results A total of 451 learner statements were analysed. Five themes emerged from the data: (i) differing views and opinions; (ii) challenges to understanding; (iii) managing emotions; (iv) initiating the EOL conversation and (v) lack of professional knowledge or capacity. Five subthemes were also organized under the theme ‘differing views and opinions’. Conclusion Planning EOL care demands high-level, compassionately skilful and sensitive care and services, which are in line with the patient’s and family’s wishes. In practice, however, there are many challenges to this, such as ensuring that patients, families, and HCPs are aware of different expectations regarding future health-care possibilities, and that HCPs are prepared for negotiating GoC to achieve quality and safe EOL care in hospitals.

Funder

Australian Government Department of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Deaths in Australia: Leading causes of death;Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW)

2. Evaluation of an End-of-Life Essentials Online Education Module on Chronic Complex Illness End-of-Life Care;Rawlings;Health Care,2020

3. Peter Saul: Let’s talk about dying;TED Conferences

4. A National Position Statement on adult end-of-life care in critical care;Bloomer;Aust Crit Care,2021

5. A good death in hospital;Hardy;Intern Med J,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3