Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports

Author:

Hibbert Peter D12ORCID,Ash Ruby3,Molloy Charlotte J12,Westbrook Johanna1ORCID,Cameron Ian D4,Carson-Stevens Andrew5,Gray Leonard C6,Reed Richard L7,Kitson Alison8,Braithwaite Jeffrey1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University , 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia

2. IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia , GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia

3. Anglicare SA , 159 Port Road, Hindmarsh, Adelaide, South Australia 5007, Australia

4. John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District and Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney , Reserve Rd, St Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia

5. PRIME Centre Wales & Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University , Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales CF14 4YS, UK

6. Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland , 288 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia

7. Discipline of General Practice, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University , Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia

8. Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Residents of aged care services can experience safety incidents resulting in preventable serious harm. Accreditation is a commonly used strategy to improve the quality of care; however, narrative information within accreditation reports is not generally analysed as a source of safety information to inform learning. In Australia, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC), the sector regulator, undertakes over 500 accreditation assessments of residential aged care services against eight national standards every year. From these assessments, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission generates detailed Site Audit Reports. In over one-third (37%) of Site Audit Reports, standards relating to Personal and Clinical Care (Standard 3) are not being met. The aim of this study was to identify the types of resident Safety Risks that relate to Personal and Clinical Care Standards not being met during accreditation or re-accreditation. These data could inform priority setting at policy, regulatory, and service levels. An analytical framework was developed based on the World Health Organization’s International Classification for Patient Safety and other fields including Clinical Issue (the issue related to the incident impacting the resident, e.g. wound/skin or pain). Information relating to safety incidents in the Site Audit Reports was extracted, and a content analysis undertaken using the analytical framework. Clinical Issue and the International Classification for Patient Safety–based classification were combined to describe a clinically intuitive category (‘Safety Risks’) to describe ways in which residents could experience unsafe care, e.g. diagnosis/assessment of pain. The resulting data were descriptively analysed. The analysis included 65 Site Audit Reports that were undertaken between September 2020 and March 2021. There were 2267 incidents identified and classified into 274 types of resident Safety Risks. The 12 most frequently occurring Safety Risks account for only 32.3% of all incidents. Relatively frequently occurring Safety Risks were organisation management of infection control; diagnosis/assessment of pain, restraint, resident behaviours, and falls; and multiple stages of wounds/skin management, e.g. diagnosis/assessment, documentation, treatment, and deterioration. The analysis has shown that accreditation reports contain valuable data that may inform prioritization of resident Safety Risks in the Australian residential aged care sector. A large number of low-frequency resident Safety Risks were detected in the accreditation reports. To address these, organizations may use implementation science approaches to facilitate evidence-based strategies to improve the quality of care delivered to residents. Improving the aged care workforces’ clinical skills base may address some of the Safety Risks associated with diagnosis/assessment and wound management.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Public enquiry into the safety and security of residents in the long-term care homes system;Giselle,2019

2. Ambitions for change: healthcare in care homes;British Geriatrics Society,2021

3. The Oakden Report;Groves,2017

4. Final Report: Care, Dignity and Respect;Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety,2021

5. Review of adverse incidents research in aged care homes: learnings, gaps, and challenges;St Clair;Gerontol Geriatr Med,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3