Deciding without data: clinical decision-making in pediatric orthopedic surgery

Author:

Nathan Karthik1,Uzosike Maechi1,Sanchez Uriel1,Karius Alexander1,Leyden Jacinta1,Segovia Nicole1,Eppler Sara1,Hastings Katherine G1,Kamal Robin1,Frick Steven1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards R105, Stanford, CA 94304-1426, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Identifying when and how often decisions are made based on high-quality evidence can inform the development of evidence-based treatment plans and care pathways, which have been shown to improve quality of care and patient safety. Evidence to guide decision-making, national guidelines and clinical pathways for many conditions in pediatric orthopedic surgery are limited. This study investigated decision-making rationale and quantified the evidence supporting decisions made by pediatric orthopedic surgeons in an outpatient clinic. Design/Setting/Participants/Intervention(s)/Main Outcome Measure(s) We recorded decisions made by eight pediatric orthopedic surgeons in an outpatient clinic and the surgeon’s reported rationale behind the decisions. Surgeons categorized the rationale for each decision as one or a combination of 12 possibilities (e.g. ‘Experience/anecdote,’ ‘First principles,’ ‘Trained to do it,’ ‘Arbitrary/instinct,’ ‘General study,’ ‘Specific study’). Results Out of 1150 total decisions, the most frequent decisions were follow-up scheduling, followed by bracing prescription/removal. The most common decision rationales were ‘First principles’ (n = 310, 27.0%) and ‘Experience/anecdote’ (n = 253, 22.0%). Only 17.8% of decisions were attributed to scientific studies, with 7.3% based on studies specific to the decision. As high as 34.6% of surgical intervention decisions were based on scientific studies, while only 10.4% of follow-up scheduling decisions were made with studies in mind. Decision category was significantly associated with a basis in scientific studies: surgical intervention and medication prescription decisions were more likely to be based on scientific studies than all other decisions. Conclusions With increasing emphasis on high value, evidence-based care, understanding the rationale behind physician decision-making can educate physicians, identify common decisions without supporting evidence and help create clinical care pathways in pediatric orthopedic surgery. Decisions based on evidence or consensus between surgeons can inform pathways and national guidelines that minimize unwarranted variation in care and waste. Decision support tools and aids could also be implemented to guide these decisions.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Wellcome Trust, Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Overtreatment in the United States;Lyu;PLoS One,2017

2. Defensive medicine: a bane to healthcare;Sekhar;Ann Med Health Sci Res,2013

3. Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work?;Panella;Int J Qual Health Care,2003

4. Prevalence and use of clinical pathways in 23 countries–an international survey by the European Pathway Association;Vanhaecht;J Integrat Care Pathway,2006

5. Care pathways lead to better teamwork: results of a systematic review;Deneckere;Soc Sci Med,2012

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3