Top four types of sentinel events in Saudi Arabia during the period 2016–19

Author:

Altalhi Nasser1,Alnaimi Haifa2,Chaouali Mafaten3,Alahmari Falaa4,Alabdulkareem Noor4,Alaama Tareef56

Affiliation:

1. Deputy General Director, Ministry of Health, Quality and Patient Safety, Zarga Alyamamah St, Al Murabba, Riyadh 12628, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2. Risk and Business Continuity Manager, Tawal Telecom Limited, Zarga Alyamamah St, Al Murabba, Riyadh 12628, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

3. Model of Care & Clinical Service Lines, Quality and Risk Management, Al-Madinah Health Cluster, General Directorate of Health, Madina Munawara 42313, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

4. Quality and patient safety department, Ministry of Health, Quality and Patient Safety, Zarga Alyamamah St, Al Murabba, Riyadh 12628, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

5. Deputy Minister for Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Zarga Alyamamah St, Al Murabba, Riyadh 12628, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

6. Assistant Professor and Consultant of Internal Medicine & Geriatric Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Zarga Alyamamah St, Al Murabba, Jeddah, Riyadh 12628, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Abstract Background This study discusses the summary, investigation and root causes of the top four sentinel events (SEs) in Saudi Arabia (SA) that occurred between January 2016 and December 2019, as reported by the Ministry of Health (MOH) and private hospitals through the MOH SE reporting system (SERS). It is intended for use by legislators, health-care facilities and the public to shed light on areas that still need improvement to preserve patient safety. Objectives The purpose of this study is to review the most common SEs reported by the MOH and private hospitals between the years 2016 and 2019 to assess the patterns and identify risk areas and the common root causes of these events in order to promote country-wide learning and support services that can improve patient safety. Methods In this retrospective descriptive study, the data were retrieved from the SERS, which routinely collects records from both MOH and private hospitals in SA. SEs were analyzed by type of event, location, time, patient demographics, outcome and root causes. Results There were 727 SEs during this period, 38.4% of which were under the category of unexpected patient death, 19.4% under maternal death, 11.7% under unexpected loss of limb or function and 9.9% under retained instruments or sponge. Common root causes were related to policies and procedures, guidelines, miscommunication between health-care facilities, shortage of staff and lack of competencies. Conclusion Given these results, efforts should focus on improving the care of deteriorating patients in general wards, ICU (Intensive Care Units) admission/discharge criteria and maternal, child and surgical safety. The results also highlighted the problem of underreporting of SEs, which needs to be addressed and improved. Linking data sources such as claims and patient complaints databases and electronic medical records to the national reporting system must also be considered to ensure an optimal estimation of the number of events.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3