Effect of automated unit dose dispensing with barcode scanning on medication administration errors: an uncontrolled before-and-after study

Author:

Jessurun Janique Gabriëlle1ORCID,Hunfeld Nicole Geertruida Maria12ORCID,Van Rosmalen Joost34ORCID,Van Dijk Monique5ORCID,Van Den Bemt Patricia Maria Lucia Adriana16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands

2. Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands

3. Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands

4. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nursing Science, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands

6. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, Groningen, RB 9700, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Medication administration errors (MAEs) occur frequently in hospitals and may compromise patient safety. Preventive strategies are needed to reduce the risk of MAEs. Objective The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of central automated unit dose dispensing with barcode-assisted medication administration on the prevalence of MAEs. Secondary aims were to assess the effect on the type and potential severity of MAEs. Furthermore, compliance with procedures regarding scanning of patient and medication barcodes and nursing staff satisfaction with the medication administration system were assessed. Methods We performed a prospective uncontrolled before-and-after study in six clinical wards in a Dutch university hospital from 2018 to 2020. MAE data were collected by observation. The primary outcome was the proportion of medication administrations with one or more MAEs. Secondary outcomes were the type and potential severity of MAEs, rates of compliance with patient identification and signing of administered medication by scanning and nursing staff satisfaction with the medication administration system. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were used for the primary outcome to adjust for confounding and for clustering on nurse and patient level. Results One or more MAEs occurred in 291 of 1490 administrations (19.5%) pre-intervention and in 258 of 1630 administrations (15.8%) post-intervention (adjusted odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.51–0.96). The rate of omission fell from 4.6% to 2.0% and of wrong dose from 3.8% to 2.1%, whereas rates of other MAE types were similar. The rate of potentially harmful MAEs fell from 3.0% (n = 44) to 0.3% (n = 5). The rates of compliance with scanning of patient and medication barcode post-intervention were 13.6% and 55.9%, respectively. The median overall satisfaction score of the nurses with the medication administration system on a 100-point scale was 70 (interquartile range 63–75, n = 193) pre-intervention and 70 (interquartile range 60–78, n = 145) post-intervention (P = 0.626, Mann–Whitney U test). Conclusion The implementation of central automated unit dose dispensing with barcode-assisted medication administration was associated with a lower probability of MAEs, including potentially harmful errors, but more compliance with scanning procedures is needed. Nurses were moderately satisfied with the medication administration system, both before and after implementation. In conclusion, despite low compliance with scanning procedures, this study shows that this intervention contributes to the improvement of medication safety in hospitals.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3