Clinical indicators to monitor health care in low back pain: a scoping review

Author:

Dos Santos Vanessa L1,Sato Karen S1,Maher Chris G23,Vidal Rubens V.C1,Grande Guilherme H.D14,Costa Leonardo O. P5,Machado Gustavo C23,Ferreira Giovanni E23ORCID,Buchbinder Rachelle6,Oliveira Crystian B14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE) , Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo 19050-920, Brazil

2. Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District , King George V Building, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia

3. Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , King George V Building, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia

4. Departamento de Educação Física, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista , Rua Roberto Simonsen, 305, Presidente Prudente, Sao Pualo 19060-900, Brazil

5. Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo , Rua Cesário Galeno, 448, Sao Paulo 03071-000, Brazil

6. Musculoskeletal Health and Wiser Health Care Units, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University , 4 Drysdale St, Malvern, Melbourne, Victoria 3144, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Clinical care indicators for low back pain can be used to monitor healthcare practices and consequently be used to evaluate success of strategies to improve care quality. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical care indicators that have been used to measure appropriateness of health care for patients with low back pain. We conducted a systematic search of five electronic databases and Google to identify clinical care indicators that have been used to measure any aspect of care for people with low back pain. Care indicators were narratively described according to their type (i.e. structure, process, or outcomes) and categorized by their purpose (e.g. to measure aspects related to assessment, imaging requests, treatment/prevention, and outcomes). A total of 3562 and 2180 records were retrieved from electronic databases and Google searches, respectively. We identified 280 indicators related to low back pain care from 40 documents and publications. Most quality indicators were process indicators (n = 213, 76%), followed by structure (n = 41, 15%) and outcome indicators (n = 26, 9%). The most common indicators were related to imaging requests (n = 41, 15%), referral to healthcare providers (n = 30, 11%), and shared decision-making (n = 21, 7%). Our review identified a range of clinical care indicators that have been used to measure the quality of health care for people with low back pain. Our findings will support a Delphi study to reach international consensus on what would be the most important and feasible indicators for a minimum dataset to be collected globally.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference25 articles.

1. GBD Results Tool;Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation,2018

2. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996-2013;Dieleman;JAMA,2016

3. Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care;Elshaug;Lancet,2017

4. Expenditures and health care utilization among adults with newly diagnosed low back and lower extremity pain;Kim;JAMA Network Open,2019

5. Characteristics of clinical indicators;Characteristics of Clinical Indicators;QRB – Qual Rev Bull,1989

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3