The development of indicators to measure the quality of care in geriatric rehabilitation

Author:

Veneberg Bram1,Tijsen Lian M J234,Wirtz Maarten J5,Zevenhuizen Viola6,Buijck Bianca I3478

Affiliation:

1. Department of Science and Technology, University of Twente , Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7522 NB, The Netherlands

2. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center , PO Box 9500, Leiden 2300 RA, The Netherlands

3. Oktober , Wielewaal 10, Bladel 5531 LJ, The Netherlands

4. De Zorgboog , Postbus 16, Bakel 5760 AA, The Netherlands

5. Geriatric Rehabilitation Centre Topaz Revitel , Bargelaan 198, Leiden 2333 CW, The Netherlands

6. ParView, Interim Management and Organisational Advice , Voorsterweg 124, Brummen 6971 KC, The Netherlands

7. Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center , Postbus 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands

8. Rotterdam Stroke Service , Nieuwe Binnenweg 33, Rotterdam 3014 GB, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Quality of care is an essential aspect of geriatric rehabilitation. Usually, there are national standards for the quality of care or indicators to measure the quality of care. However, this is not the case for geriatric rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop structure, process, and outcome indicators to measure the quality of geriatric rehabilitation. To develop quality indicators for geriatric rehabilitation, a literature search was performed to identify indicators for all types of rehabilitation that can also be suitable for geriatric rehabilitation. Thereafter, in the qualitative phase, different stakeholders were inte. Indicators from the literature and indicators developed based on the interviews were merged and processed in a questionnaire. Through this questionnaire, elderly care physicians and managers of geriatric rehabilitation facilities were asked to rate the indicators on relevance and feasibility. Indicators that were considered relevant and feasible by the respondents were included in the final quality indicator set for geriatric rehabilitation. Thirty-six indicators suitable for geriatric rehabilitation were identified from the literature. Additionally, 55 quality indicators were developed based on the interviews. Merging the indicators and omitting duplicates resulted in 69 quality indicators. Analysis of the data from the questionnaires resulted in a final set of 27 quality indicators for geriatric rehabilitation that consists of 17 structure, 8 process, and 2 outcome indicators. This study contributes to the quality of geriatric rehabilitation by providing a first set of quality indicators ready to use in practice. Follow-up research is recommended and may include an assessment of the applicability, reliability, and validity of the developed indicator set.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division;United Nations,2017

2. Rehabilitation: the health strategy of the twenty-first century;Stucki;J Rehabil Med,2018

3. Health, functioning, and disability in older adults—present status and future implications;Chatterji;Lancet (London, England),2015

4. World Report on Disability 2011;WHO (World Health Organization);Am J Phys Med Rehabil Assoc Acad Physiatr,2011

5. Hospitalization-associated disability: “She was probably able to ambulate, but I’m not sure”;Covinsky;JAMA,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3