Effects of a team Quality Improvement method in a national clinical audit programme of four clinical specialties in Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia

Author:

Alghamdi Saleh1ORCID,Dixon Nancy2ORCID,Al-Senani Fahmi3,Al Aseri Zohair4,Al Saif Shukri5,AlTahan Talal6

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Excellence General Directorate, Ministry of Health , Riyadh 14726, Saudi Arabia

2. Healthcare Quality Quest , Shelley Farm, Shelley Lane, Ower, Romsey, Hampshire SO51 6AS, United Kingdom

3. Stroke Saudi Clinical Expert Group, Model of Care Programme, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 11525, Saudi Arabia

4. Sepsis Saudi Clinical Expert Group, Departments of Emergency and Critical Care, College of Medicine, King Saud University and Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Riyadh Hospital, Dar Al Uloom University, Adult ICU services, Ministry of Health , Riyadh 145111, Saudi Arabia

5. Myocardial Infarction Saudi Clinical Expert Group, Eastern Health Cluster, Saudi Al-Babtain Cardiac Centre , Qatif, Dammam 32632, Saudi Arabia

6. Major Trauma Saudi Clinical Expert Group, Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital , Riyadh 14214, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Abstract In 2018, the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Saudi Arabia developed a clinical excellence strategy. An objective was to reduce variation in clinical practices in MoH hospitals, particularly for conditions with high mortality in Saudi Arabia, by applying best practice clinical standards and using the clinical audit process to measure clinical practice. The strategy included working with multiprofessional teams in hospitals to implement improvements needed in clinical practice. To test the feasibility of carrying out national clinical audits in MoH hospitals, audits were carried out in 16 MoH hospitals on four clinical subjects—acute myocardial infarction, major trauma, sepsis, and stroke. Clinical expert groups, including Saudi clinicians and an international clinical expert, developed clinical care standards for the four conditions from analyses of international and Saudi clinical guidelines. The audits were designed with the expert groups. Multiprofessional teams were appointed to carry out the audits in designated MoH hospitals. Data collectors in each hospital were trained to collect data. Workshops were held with the teams on the clinical care standards and how data would be collected for the audits, and later, on the findings of data collection and how to use the improvement process to implement changes to improve compliance with the standards. After 4 months, data collection was repeated to determine if compliance with the clinical care standards had improved. Data collected from each hospital for both cycles of data collection were independently reliably tested. All designated hospitals participated in the audits, collecting and submitting data for two rounds of data collection and implementing improvement plans after the first round of data collection. All hospitals made substantial improvements in clinical practices. Of a total of 84 measures used to assess compliance with a total of 52 clinical care standards for the four clinical conditions, improvements were made by hospital teams in 58 (69.1%) measures. Improvements were statistically significant for 34 (40.5%) measures. The project demonstrated that well-designed and executed audits using evidence-based clinical care standards can result in substantial improvements in clinical practices in MoH hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Keys to success were the improvement methodology built into the audit process and the requirement for hospitals to appoint multiprofessional teams to carry out the audits. The approach adds to evidence on the effectiveness of clinical audits in achieving improvements in clinical quality and can be replicated in national audit programmes.

Funder

Health Holding Company

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Healthcare transformation in Saudi Arabia: an overview since the launch of Vision 2030;Alasiri;Health Serv Insights,2022

2. Transformation of health care and the new model of care in Saudi Arabia: Kingdom’s Vision 2030;Chowdhury;J Med Life,2021

3. Saudi Vision 2020;Health Sector Transformation Program

4. Delivery Plan 2020–2021;Health Sector Transformation Program

5. A new era of national guideline development in Saudi Arabia;Memish;J Epidemiol Glob Health,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3