Identifying psychiatric diagnostic errors with the Safer Dx Instrument

Author:

Fletcher Terri L123ORCID,Helm Ashley23,Vaghani Viralkumar12,Kunik Mark E123,Stanley Melinda A123,Singh Hardeep12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, (MEDVAMC 152), 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA

2. Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA

3. VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (A Virtual Center), Houston, TX 77030, USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveDiagnostic errors in psychiatry are understudied partly because they are difficult to measure. The current study aimed to adapt and test the Safer Dx Instrument, a structured tool to review electronic health records (EHR) for errors in medical diagnoses, to evaluate errors in anxiety diagnoses to improve measurement of psychiatric diagnostic errors.DesignThe iterative adaptation process included a review of the revised Safer Dx-Mental Health Instrument by mental health providers to ensure content and face validity and review by a psychometrician to ensure methodologic validity and pilot testing of the revised instrument.SettingsNone.ParticipantsPilot testing was conducted on 128 records of patients diagnosed with anxiety in integrated primary care mental health clinics. Cases with anxiety diagnoses documented in progress notes but not included as a diagnosis for the encounter (n = 25) were excluded.Intervention(s)None.Main Outcome Measure(s)None.ResultsOf 103 records meeting the inclusion criteria, 62 likely involved a diagnostic error (42 from use of unspecified anxiety diagnosis when a specific anxiety diagnosis was warranted; 20 from use of unspecified anxiety diagnosis when anxiety symptoms were either undocumented or documented but not severe enough to warrant diagnosis). Reviewer agreement on presence/absence of errors was 88% (κ = 0.71).ConclusionThe revised Safer Dx-Mental Health Instrument has a high reliability for detecting anxiety-related diagnostic errors and deserves testing in additional psychiatric populations and clinical settings.

Funder

Effectiveness and Safety

Department of Veterans Affairs

Baylor College of Medicine

Fiscal Year 2018 Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Seed Award

Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3