Affiliation:
1. Roskilde University, Department of Science and Environment, Universitetsvej 1, Roskilde, Denmark
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the world has raced to understand and accurately diagnose infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. Today, hundreds of commercial antibody tests are on the market despite often lacking proper validation and with unsatisfactory sensitivity and/or specificity. In addition, many questions related to the humoral response remain unresolved, although research is carried out at an unprecedented speed. Despite the shortcomings, serological assays have an important part to play in combating the pandemic by aiding in diagnosis and sero-epidemiological studies. However, careful attention must be paid to the application of serology and the interpretation of serological data—especially in low prevalence regions, both at an individual and at a population level. In this article, we argue that serological results are often misinterpreted, and in the eagerness to be first, methodological rigor is often taking a backseat.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Immunology and Microbiology,General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy
Reference53 articles.
1. Lack of cross-neutralization by SARS patient sera towards SARS-CoV-2;Anderson;Emerg Microbes Infect,2020
2. SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells in healthy donors and patients with COVID-19;Braun;Nature,2020
3. Information for Laboratories about Coronavirus (COVID-19) Antibody;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,2020
4. Information for Laboratories about Coronavirus (COVID-19) Antigen testing;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,2020
5. Poor correlation between antibody titers and neutralizing activity in sera from SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects;Criscuolo;medRxiv,2020
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献