Willingness to participate in cardiac telerehabilitation: results from semi-structured interviews

Author:

Falter Maarten123ORCID,Scherrenberg Martijn124ORCID,Kindermans Hanne2ORCID,Kizilkilic Sevda5,Kaihara Toshiki126ORCID,Dendale Paul12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium

2. Department of Cardiovascular research, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan gebouw D, Diepenbeek, BE3590 Hasselt, Belgium

3. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, KULeuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

4. Department of Cardiovascular research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium

5. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium

6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2 Chome-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae Ward, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-8511 Kawasaki, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Aims Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is indicated in patients with cardiovascular disease but participation rates remain low. Telerehabilitation (TR) is often proposed as a solution. While many trials have investigated TR, few have studied participation rates in conventional CR non-participants. The aim of this study was to identify the percentage of patients that would be willing to participate in a TR programme to identify the main perceived barriers and facilitators for participating in TR. Methods and results Two groups of patients were recruited: CR non-participants and CR participants. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Thirty non-participants and 30 participants were interviewed. Of CR non-participants, 33% would participate in TR and 10% would participate in a blended CR programme (combination of centre-based CR and TR). Of CR participants, 60% would participate in TR and 70% would be interested in a blended CR programme. Of those that would participate in TR, 44% would prefer centre-based CR, 33% would prefer a blended CR programme, and 11% would prefer a full TR programme. In both groups, the main facilitating aspect about TR was not needing transport and the main barrier was digital literacy. Conclusion For CR non-participants, TR will only partly solve the problem of low participation rates and blended programmes might not offer a solution. Cardiac rehabilitation participants are more prepared to participate in TR and blended CR. Digital literacy was in both groups mentioned as an important barrier, emphasizing the challenges for healthcare and local governments to keep educating all types of patients in digital literacy.

Funder

Horizons 2020 Grant in the CoroPrevention project

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3