Political Surveys Bias Self-Reported Economic Perceptions

Author:

Bailey Jack

Abstract

Abstract If voters are to hold governments to account for the state of the economy, they must know how it has changed. Indeed, this is a prerequisite for democratic accountability. Yet the perceptions that voters report often show signs of clear partisan bias. At present, we do not know if this bias is real or instead due to priming in political surveys. To test this, I assign subjects at random to either a political or nonpolitical survey. I then record their economic perceptions and compare the results for each group. I show that political surveys do worsen partisan bias, though only among supporters of the incumbent party. Still, much partisan bias remains unexplained, even in the nonpolitical condition. So, while economic perception items remain biased, we can at least be sure that most people respond to them in a similar way no matter the survey context.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,History,Communication

Reference46 articles.

1. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability;Anderson;Annual Review of Political Science,2007

2. “Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election;Anderson;” Electoral Studies,2004

3. ‘That’s Not How It Works’: Economic Indicators and the Construction of Partisan Economic Narratives;Anson;Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties,2017

4. “Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work;Ashworth;Annual Review of Political Science,2012

5. “The Fact Remains: Party ID Moderates How Voters Respond to Economic Change;Bailey;Electoral Studies,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Partisan Biases among the Unemployed;Government and Opposition;2023-08-30

2. No Evidence that Measuring Moderators Alters Treatment Effects;American Journal of Political Science;2023-07-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3