Applicability of the Mutation–Selection Balance Model to Population Genetics of Heterozygous Protein-Truncating Variants in Humans

Author:

Weghorn Donate123,Balick Daniel J23,Cassa Christopher23,Kosmicki Jack A45,Daly Mark J45,Beier David R67,Sunyaev Shamil R23

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Genomic Regulation and Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

2. Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

3. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

4. Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

5. Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA

6. Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA

7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

Abstract

Abstract The fate of alleles in the human population is believed to be highly affected by the stochastic force of genetic drift. Estimation of the strength of natural selection in humans generally necessitates a careful modeling of drift including complex effects of the population history and structure. Protein-truncating variants (PTVs) are expected to evolve under strong purifying selection and to have a relatively high per-gene mutation rate. Thus, it is appealing to model the population genetics of PTVs under a simple deterministic mutation–selection balance, as has been proposed earlier (Cassa et al. 2017). Here, we investigated the limits of this approximation using both computer simulations and data-driven approaches. Our simulations rely on a model of demographic history estimated from 33,370 individual exomes of the Non-Finnish European subset of the ExAC data set (Lek et al. 2016). Additionally, we compared the African and European subset of the ExAC study and analyzed de novo PTVs. We show that the mutation–selection balance model is applicable to the majority of human genes, but not to genes under the weakest selection.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Molecular Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3