Dewey’s Independent Factors in Moral Action

Author:

Fesmire Steven

Abstract

Abstract This chapter builds on Dewey to illustrate the way a pragmatic pluralism can accommodate traditional monistic insights while delegitimizing moral fundamentalism’s single vision. Drawing on archival and published sources from 1926 to 1932, this is the culminating theoretical chapter. A primary focus is “Three Independent Factors in Morals,” Dewey’s (1930b) address at the Sorbonne. Exploring the hypothesis that problematic moral situations are heterogeneous in their origins and operations, Dewey traced traditional abstract categories of good, duty, and virtue back to their generative experiential roots. The chapter suggests that contemporary theorizing should foster a range of idioms and emphases which inform decision-making by (1) opening communication across diverse elements of moral and political life, (2) placing these elements in a wider context in which norms gain a better footing amid the discordance of nonideal conditions, and (3) expanding prospects for social inquiry and convergence on policy and action.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York, NY

Reference343 articles.

1. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans.”;Abramowitz;Political Psychology,2018

2. “Cultivating Values on the College Farm.”;Ackerman-Leist;Pacific Standard,2017

3. Pragmatism, Pluralism, and the Nature of Philosophy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3