Abstract
Abstract
Reflecting upon the preceding chapters, the conclusion answers the following questions: How does the book contribute to the study of status in world politics? What kind of research agenda does a theory-of-status framework enable that was hitherto foreclosed? Among the avenues opened up, the conclusion argues that a TIS approach provides a systematic means of analyzing change in international status hierarchies, by providing a framework for exploring the emergence, spread, contestation, and potential withering of specific theories of international status and examining these theories’ political consequences. The conclusion also responds to skeptics that may question whether the TIS approach refers to “real” status at all. It concludes with a counterintuitive policy implication of the book’s substance: that status ambiguity among states and publics is a social good to be cherished because it can mitigate zero-sum competitions.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Reference419 articles.
1. “Pisa-tester splitter de rødgrønne.”;ABC Nyheter,2016
2. Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity.”;American Political Science Review,2005