Affiliation:
1. Johns Hopkins University Berman Institute of Bioethics , Baltimore, Maryland , USA
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, I address the question of whether it is ever permissible to grant a request for physician-aid-in-dying (PAD) from an individual suffering from treatment-resistant depression. I assume for the sake of argument that PAD is sometimes permissible. There are three requirements for PAD: suffering, prognosis, and competence. First, an individual must be suffering from an illness or injury which is sufficient to cause serious, ongoing hardship. Second, one must have exhausted effective treatment options, and one’s prospects for recovery must be poor. Third, the individual must be judged competent to request PAD. I argue that many cases of treatment-resistant depression meet the first two requirements. Thus, the key question concerns the third. I consider four features of depression that might compromise a person’s decision-making capacity. Ultimately, I conclude that PAD requests from depressed patients can be permissibly granted in some circumstances.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference36 articles.
1. The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: Implications for informed consent;Ahlin;Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy,2018
2. Physician-assisted death for patients with mental disorders—reasons for concern;Appelbaum;JAMA Psychiatry,2016
3. Treatment-resistant depression;Atiq;Psychiatry,2006
4. Depression in adults: Drug and physical treatments;Barbui;BMJ Clinical Evidence,2007
5. Depression
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献