Affiliation:
1. Delft University of Technology , Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
This article provides analysis of the mechanisms and outputs involved in language-use mediated by a neuroprosthetic device. It is motivated by the thought that users of speech neuroprostheses require sufficient control over what their devices externalize as synthetic speech if they are to be thought of as responsible for it, but that the nature of this control, and so the status of their responsibility, is not clear.
Funder
BrainCom Project, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference41 articles.
1. Towards reconstructing intelligible speech from the human auditory cortex.;Akbari;Scientific Reports,2018
2. Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology.;Alderson-Day;Psychological Bulletin,2015
3. A neural probabilistic language model.;Bengio;Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003
4. Breaking the silence: Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control.;Birbaumer;Psychophysiology,2006
5. Brain–computer interfaces: Communication and restoration of movement in paralysis.;Birbaumer;The Journal of Physiology,2007
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献