Affiliation:
1. University of Guelph , Guelph, Ontario , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
I argue that Alasdair MacIntyre has important resources to provide in the debate over the moral status of severely disabled people. In contrast, Gregory Poore suggests that MacIntyre’s virtue theory cannot account for our responsibilities to severely disabled people. Given that MacIntyre bases his theory around community membership, this charge is made especially severe in the case of severely disabled strangers. I present an interpretation of MacIntyre that accounts for responsibilities to severely disabled strangers. I then argue that Poore is wrong to conclude that MacIntyre does not include severely disabled people in communities.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference44 articles.
1. Politics.;Aristotle.,2001
2. Forming expressions of personality;Asch;Journal of Social Psychology,1946
3. Ableism special issue introduction;Bogart;Journal of Social Issues,2019
4. The association of group-based discrimination with health and well-being: A comparison of ableism with other “isms.”;Branco;Journal of Social Issues,2019