Efficacy of a 3-day pretravel schedule of tafenoquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis: a network meta-analysis

Author:

Islam Nazmul1,Wright Sophie2,Lau Colleen L34,Doi Suhail A R5,Mills Deborah J46,Clark Justin7,Clements Archie C A8,Furuya-Kanamori Luis69

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, PO BOX 2713, Qatar

2. ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

3. School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia

4. Dr Deb The Travel Doctor, Travel Medicine Alliance, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

5. Department of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, PO BOX 2713, Qatar

6. Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

7. Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia

8. Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia

9. UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Chemoprophylaxis with weekly doses of tafenoquine (200 mg/day for 3 days before departure [loading dose], 200 mg/week during travel and 1-week post-travel [maintenance doses]) is effective in preventing malaria. Effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis drugs in travellers is often compromised by poor compliance. Shorter schedules that can be completed before travel, allowing ‘drug-free holidays’, could increase compliance and thus reduce travel-related malaria. In this meta-analysis, we examined if a loading dose of tafenoquine alone is effective in preventing malaria in short-term travellers. Methods Four databases were searched in November 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed efficacy and/or safety of tafenoquine for chemoprophylaxis. Network meta-analysis using the generalized pair-wise modelling framework was utilized to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of malaria infection in long-term (>28 days) and short-term (≤28 days) travellers, as well as adverse events (AEs) associated with receiving loading dose of tafenoquine alone, loading dose of tafenoquine followed by maintenance doses, loading dose of mefloquine followed by maintenance doses, or placebo. Results Nine RCTs (1714 participants) were included. In long-term travellers, compared to mefloquine, tafenoquine with maintenance doses (OR = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–2.46) was equally effective in preventing malaria, while there was an increased risk of infection with the loading dose of tafenoquine alone (OR = 2.89; 95% CI: 0.78–10.68) and placebo (OR = 62.91; 95% CI: 8.53–463.88). In short-term travellers, loading dose of tafenoquine alone (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.04–22.42) and tafenoquine with maintenance doses (OR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.06–16.10) were as effective as mefloquine. The risk of AEs with tafenoquine with maintenance doses (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.67–1.60) was similar to mefloquine, while loading dose of tafenoquine alone (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.20–1.66) was associated with lower risk of AEs, although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions For short-term travellers, loading dose of tafenoquine alone was equally effective, had possibly lower rate of AEs, and likely better compliance than standard tafenoquine or mefloquine chemoprophylaxis schedules with maintenance doses. Studies are needed to confirm if short-term travellers remain free of infection after long-term follow-up. Registration The meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021223756). Highlight Tafenoquine is the latest approved drug for malaria chemoprophylaxis. A loading dose of tafenoquine (200 mg/day for 3 days before departure) is as effective in preventing malaria in short-term (≤28 days) travellers as chemoprophylaxis schedules of tafenoquine or mefloquine with maintenance doses, allowing travellers to have a ‘drug-free holiday’.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3