Affiliation:
1. Institute of Philosophy, University of London , UK
2. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford , UK
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter examines semantically-significant representational structure and distinguishes two broad kinds: structural representation and general-purpose compositional structure. Structural representations rely on a structural correspondence between representation and world, like maps. General-purpose compositional structure is exemplified by natural language sentences and conscious deliberate thoughts composed out of concepts. This allows any concept to be combined with any other concept(s) of the right type, unlike structural representations where the relations that define structure have specific representational contents. After defining representational structure, the chapter surveys different varieties found in mental representations. It then characterizes structural representation, distinguishing this from mere representational organization. Next it focuses on the general-purpose compositionality of language and thought, arguing that this is not a form of structural representation, or if it is, then only of a very abstract kind. The chapter clarifies terminology and draws connections between representational structure, computational processes, and informational models.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference435 articles.
1. Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning;Ackerman;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2017
2. Heterogeneous inferences with maps;Aguilera;Synthese,2021
3. Signatures of cross-modal alignment in children’s early concepts;Aho;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2023
4. The anterior cingulate cortex predicts future states to mediate model-based action selection;Akam;Neuron,2021
5. Lexical pragmatic adjustment and the nature of ad hoc concepts;Allott;International Review of Pragmatics,2012