Minimum Income Protection for Workers

Author:

Heitlinger Sara1,Foth Marcus2,Clarke Rachel3

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 3 looks at what makes for adequate minimum income protection for workers—or, more exactly, people mainly reliant on earned income. The chapter looks at income protection guaranteed to workers who are full-time employed at the minimum wage, as an idealtypical benchmark case. The situation of minimum wage earners is a useful indicator to gauge the protection guaranteed to workers in general, as it should in principle be ‘the least favourable’. The chapter sketches the history of the minimum wage, its determinants, and employment effects, and discusses the variation in the level and relevance of minimum wages in the overall wage distribution. Building on hypothetical household simulations, the chapter analyses in depth the adequacy and design of the different policy instruments, such as taxes, child benefits, and in-work benefits, that together define the adequacy of the minimally guaranteed net disposable income for a full-time minimum wage worker and his or her family. Clearly, there are problems with the selection of a hypothetical full-time minimum wage worker as an idealtypical representative of the in-work income floor. For that reason the chapter expands its analysis by simulating and discussing the level of the guaranteed income to workers with more spotty and piecemeal labour market attachment. Finally, the chapter assesses the link between in-work income floors and poverty, and lists which policy instruments appear to be most relevant in guaranteeing adequate minimum income protection packages for the working population.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference596 articles.

1. Setting the scene: The mix of family policy objectives and packages across the OECD;Adema;Children and Youth Services Review,2012

2. Income support policies for single parents in Europe and the U.S.: What works best?;Aerts;The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,2022

3. Not that basic: how level, design, and context matter for the redistributive outcomes of universal basic income;Aerts,2023

4. Out of the wilderness? The coming back of the debate on minimum income in Spain and the Great Recession;Aguilar-Hendrickson;Social Policy & Administration,2020

5. The politics of safety net reform in Southern Europe during the Great Recession: Introduction to the regional issue;Aguilar-Hendrickson;Social Policy & Administration,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3