Affiliation:
1. University of Wisconsin-Madison
Abstract
Abstract
Many historical and philosophical studies treat infinity as an exclusively quantitative notion, whose proper domain of application is mathematics and physics. The main aim of this paper is to disentangle, by critically examining, three notions of infinity in the early modern period, and to argue that one—but only one—of them is quantitative. One of these non-quantitative notions concerns being or reality, while the other concerns a particular iterative property of an aggregate. These three notions will emerge through examination of three central figures in the period: Locke (for quantitative infinity), Descartes (ontic infinity), and Leibniz (iterative infinity).
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference68 articles.
1. ‘Locke and the Intuitionist Theory of Number’;Aaron;Philosophy,1965
2. ‘Cavalieri’s Method of Indivisibles’;Andersen;Archive for the History of Exact Sciences,1985
3. John Locke and Natural Philosophy
4. ‘John Locke on Measurement’;Anstey;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,2016
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献