Recommendations from Thai stakeholders about protecting HIV remission (‘cure’) trial participants: report from a participatory workshop

Author:

Peay Holly L1ORCID,Ormsby Nuchanart Q2,Henderson Gail E2,Jupimai Thidarat3,Rennie Stuart24,Siripassorn Krittaecho5,Kanchawee Kunakorn6,Isaacson Sinéad27,Cadigan R Jean24,Kuczynski Kriste2,Likhitwonnawut Udom8

Affiliation:

1. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA

2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, USA

3. Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

4. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Bioethics, USA

5. Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Thailand

6. Center of Excellence in Research on Gender, Sexuality and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Thailand

7. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Epidemiology, USA

8. Thailand National CAB on HIV research, Thailand

Abstract

Abstract Background The social/behavioral HIV Decision-Making Study (DMS) assesses informed consent and trial experiences of individuals in HIV remission trials in Thailand. We convened a 1-d multi-stakeholder participatory workshop in Bangkok. We provide a meeting summary and reactions from DMS investigators. Methods Workshop members viewed de-identified interview excerpts from DMS participants. They deliberated on the findings and made recommendations regarding informed choice for remission trials. Notes and recordings were used to create a summary report, which was reviewed by members and refined. Results Workshop members’ recommendations included HIV education and psychosocial support to establish the basis for informed choice, key trial information to be provided in everyday language, supportive decision-making processes and psychosocial care during and after the trial. Concerns included participant willingness to restart antiretrovirals after trial-mandated treatment interruption, unintended influence of the research team on decision-making and seemingly altruistic motivations for trial participation that may signal attempts to atone for stigmatized behavior. Conclusions The workshop highlighted community perspectives and resulted in recommendations for supporting informed choice and psychosocial and physical health. These are the first such recommendations arising from a deliberative process. Although some elements are rooted in the Thai context, most are applicable across remission trials.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine,Health (social science)

Reference24 articles.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3