Prevalence of neonatal near miss in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Haile Teklehaimanot Gereziher12,Gebregziabher Dawit3,Gebremeskel Gebreamlak Gebremedhn4,Mebrahtom Guesh4,Aberhe Woldu4,Hailay Abrha4,Zereabruk Kidane4,Gebrewahd Gebremeskel Tukue5,Getachew Tamirat6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. S , Tigray , Ethiopia

2. chool of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Axum University , Tigray , Ethiopia

3. Department of Maternity and Reproductive Nursing, School of Nursing, Aksum University , Aksum , Ethiopia

4. Department of Adult Health Nursing, School of Nursing, Aksum University , Aksum , Ethiopia

5. Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing, Aksum University , Aksum , Ethiopia

6. School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University , Harar , Ethiopia

Abstract

Abstract Background Neonatal near miss (NNM) applies to cases where newborns almost died during the first 28 d of life but survived life-threatening conditions following birth. The most vulnerable time for infant survival is the neonatal stage, corresponding to almost 50% of deaths occurring at <5 y of age. No study indicates the overall pooled prevalence of NNM in Africa. Thus this review aimed to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of NNMs in Africa. Methods Articles were retrieved through a comprehensive search strategy using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative, Cochrane Library and Google Search. Data extraction was done independently by all authors. Forest plots and tables were used to represent the original data. The statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. There was heterogeneity between the included articles. Therefore the authors used a meta-analysis of random effects to estimate the aggregate pooled prevalence of NNM in Africa. Funnel plot and Egger regression test methods were used to assess possible publication bias. R software version 3.5.3 and R studio version 1.2.5003 were used to analyse the data. The guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to publish this article. The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration ID: CRD42021290223). Results Through an exhaustive search, we found 835 articles. However, we considered only eight full-text articles to be included in this meta-analysis. The analysis of included studies showed that the overall pooled prevalence of NNM in Africa was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16 to 44). The subgroup analysis by study year showed that the prevalence of NNM from 2012–2015 and 2018–2019 was 36% (95% CI 23 to 49) and 20% (95% CI 1 to 39), respectively. Conclusion This finding suggests that the pooled prevalence of NNM is high in Africa as compared with other studies. Therefore the government and other stakeholders working on maternal and child health should assist in the design of interventions and strategies for improving the quality of neonatal care.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3