Dismantling or Disguising Racialization?: Defining Racialized Change Work in the Context of Postsecondary Grantmaking

Author:

McCambly Heather1,Colyvas Jeannette A2

Affiliation:

1. University of Pittsburgh , USA

2. Northwestern University , USA

Abstract

Abstract Grantmaking organizations (GMOs) exert considerable influence on education systems, public policy, and its administration. We position the work of GMOs—in the distribution and management of funds for the public good—as a form of public management. Using recent work on racialized organizations from sociology, critical theories of race, and institutional theory, we address the role of GMOs in dismantling or reproducing inequalities. In doing so, we develop a new construct—racialized change work—to refer to the purposive action that organizations take to build new, equitable organizational arrangements or tear down old, inequitable ones. We develop quantifiable and testable propositions for how racialized change work might spread (engagement), how it might stick (institutionalization), and what effects it may have on producing equitable outcomes (impact). We build these propositions in the context of US higher education and demonstrate their portability across areas of public policy and administration. We conclude with a discussion of our contributions back to the theories from which we draw and their relationship to public administration.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Marketing,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference134 articles.

1. Racial bias: A buried cornerstone of the administrative state;Alexander;Administration and Society,2020

2. Philanthropic foundations: What rationales?;Anheier;Social Research,2013

3. The organizational reproduction of inequality;Amis;Academy of Management Annals,2020

4. “What sticks and why? A MoRe institutional framework for education research.”;Anderson;Teachers College Record,2021

5. Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics;Ansari;Research Policy,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3