Improving retrospective intervention descriptions: Lessons learned from research on type 2 diabetes programmes in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland

Author:

Carvalho Márcia1ORCID,Hawkes Rhiannon E2ORCID,Hadjiconstantinou Michelle34ORCID,Byrne Molly1ORCID,French David P2ORCID,McSharry Jenny1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway , Galway , Republic of Ireland

2. Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK

3. Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester , Leicester , UK

4. Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester , Leicester , UK

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, multiple countries worldwide have implemented behavioural interventions within national healthcare systems. Describing the content of these interventions is critical to improve their implementation, replication, and effectiveness, as well as to advance behavioural science. Tools, such as the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy, can enhance the quality of intervention description and reporting. As interventions are frequently developed without the use of such tools, retrospective coding of existing interventions to accurately characterise their content is becoming more common. However, the use of these tools for retrospective coding poses various challenges, the discussion of which has been neglected to date. This commentary discusses the challenges encountered when retrospectively describing the content of five nationally implemented programmes for type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland and suggests recommendations to tackle these challenges. We present important methodological, practical, and ethical considerations for researchers to reflect on, relevant to the retrospective description of existing interventions. Specifically, we discuss (i) the importance of positive relationships and collaboration with intervention stakeholders, (ii) the practical and ethical considerations when analysing the content of implemented interventions, (iii) the independence of research teams and the potential for misclassification of intervention content, and (iv) the challenges associated with the analysis of intervention content using behavioural science tools. There is a growing demand for more robust approaches to address the methodological, practical, and ethical challenges associated with such studies. The present commentary describes key issues to be considered by research teams, as well as concrete recommendations to improve the retrospective characterisation of intervention content.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference57 articles.

1. Management and prevention strategies for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors;Budreviciute;Front Public Health,2020

2. Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in children and adults with overweight or obesity;Flodgren;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

3. Exercise interventions for smoking cessation;Ussher;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3