Affiliation:
1. University of California , Irvine , USA
Abstract
AbstractAs immigration enforcement increases, so does the detention of immigrants facing the threat of deportation. Detained without the support of a public defender system—a feature of U.S. immigration law—immigrants face a complex immigration court that is adversarial and can produce dire consequences, including family and community exile, violence, or even death, if they are deported. This paper chronicles the experiences of formerly detained immigrants and how they sought to access justice through multiple means while detained. To win their freedom from detention, they engaged in “precarious legal patchworking” (PLP), during which they haphazardly cobbled together legal resources and assistance from multiple sources, including pro-bono aid, Jailhouse Lawyers, and social networks. PLP speaks to the person’s tenacity amidst precarity, but it also unveils the fragility of this strategy because patchworking can extend detention or complicate one’s case. The lack of access to counsel is a form of legal violence, and stratifying access to representation in this way creates an underclass of people who are systematically denied justice.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference52 articles.
1. “Advancing the Right to Counsel in Removal Proceedings Civil Legal Representation and Access to Justice: Breaking Point or Opportunity for Change.”;Adams;Seattle Journal for Social Justice,2010
2. Remaking the American Mainstream
3. “How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make: The Effect of Defense Counsel on Murder Case Outcomes.”;Anderson;Yale Law Journal,2012
4. “Latinos and the Crimmigration System.”;Armenta,2017
5. “Deportation Decisions: Judicial Decision-Making in an American Immigration Court.”;Asad;American Behavioral Scientist,2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献