Affiliation:
1. University of Bath, UK
2. Chapman University, USA
3. Appalachian State University, USA
Abstract
Abstract
This article examines the influence of focality in Colonel Blotto games with a lottery contest success function (CSF), where the equilibrium is unique and in pure strategies. We hypothesise that the salience of battlefields affects strategic behaviour (the salient target hypothesis) and present a controlled test of this hypothesis against Nash predictions, checking the robustness of equilibrium play. When the sources of salience come from asymmetries in battlefield values or labels (as in Schelling, 1960), subjects over-allocate the resource to the salient battlefields relative to the Nash prediction. However, the effect is stronger with salient values. In the absence of salience, we find support for the Nash prediction.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference92 articles.
1. A Blotto game with incomplete information;Adamo;Economics Letters,2009
2. The tennis coach problem: a game-theoretic and experimental study;Arad;The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics,2012
3. Multi-dimensional iterative reasoning in action: the case of the Colonel Blotto game;Arad;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2012
4. Terrorism experiments;Arce;Journal of Peace Research,2011
5. Weakest-link attacker–defender games with multiple attack technologies;Arce;Naval Research Logistics (NRL),2012
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献