Racial Perspectives on Facelifts: Evaluating Techniques and Outcomes Across Diverse Populations

Abstract

Abstract Background Facial aesthetic surgery is one of plastic and reconstructive surgery's most sought-after and evolving areas. The growing diversity in both local and worldwide populations compels us to reevaluate our previous approaches and underscores the significance of departing from a singular aesthetic standard. Thankfully, the historical practice of stereotypical racial profiling has become less prevalent in the literature. Regrettably, however, the comparative terminology persists, characterizing non-Caucasian races as deviating from the “norm,” which typically refers to the White or Caucasian race. Additionally, there is a lack of contemporary literature comparing the distinctive considerations relevant to rhytidectomy across multiple racial populations. Objectives The aim of this study was to succinctly outline the current body of literature examining the impact of race on facial aging and rhytidectomy, laying the groundwork for subsequent discussion on the relationship between race and facial aesthetic surgery. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), identifying all studies published before 2023 discussing facial aging and rhytidectomy, specifically in non-Caucasian patients. Results A total of 22 publications was identified. Asians were the most described group, with 12 publications, followed by Black/African with 5 and Hispanic/Latinx with 4. Conclusions In today's context, the aesthetic surgeon must possess the knowledge and readiness to provide culturally sensitive, patient-centered care guided by subtle anatomical nuances, informed by anecdotal recommendations, and ultimately, aimed at effectively addressing aging concerns within diverse populations. Level of Evidence: 3