Protein Content of Wheat by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy of Whole Grain: Collaborative Study

Author:

Delwiche Stephen R1,Pierce Richard O2,Chung Okkyung K3,Seabourn Bradford W3, ,Baker L,Boyd T,Brenner c,Cain L,Chung E,Cohoef E,Delwiche S,Drapcho C,Flemm J,Gell A,Gerjets L,Gipson N,Guillemette R,Hughes R,Hurburgh C,Jackson C,Jessop D,Johnson D,Johnson D,Krouse R,LaCour C P,Lego M,Lewis V,Mbuvi S,McCaig T,Perbix K,Psotka J,Seabourn B

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Instrumentation and Sensing Laboratory, Bldg 303, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350

2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration, Federal Grain Inspection Service, Technical Services Division, 10383 N. Executive Hills Blvd, Kansas City, MO 64153

3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Grain Marketing and Production Research Laboratory, 1515 College Ave, Manhattan, KS 66502

Abstract

abstract A collaborative study was performed to assess accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of a nearinfrared (near-IR) method for determining crude protein content (PC) of whole-grain wheat. Four types of commercially available near-IR instruments, representing various combinations of wavelength region, mode of energy capture, method of energy dispersion, and treatment of spectral data, were used. Eight, 9,10, and 11 collaborators were involved, the exact number depending on instrument type. All collaborators received 22 samples of whole-grain hard red winter (HRW) wheat. They were furnished reference PCs (i.e., protein concentrations, w/w) corrected to a 12% moisture basis for instrument standardization. AOAC Method 990.03— combustion analysis—was the reference procedure. Standardization consisted of performing one of the following treatments to the instrument manufacturer's (or federal agency's) PC equation: (1) bias correction, (2) slope and intercept correction, or (3) recalibration with inclusion of standardization sample spectra. Standardized equations were then applied to a test set of 12 unknown HRW wheat sample spectra, with 2 samples blindly duplicated. The PCs of test samples ranged from 9 to 16%. Near-IR predictions were compared with reference measurements. Averaged within instrument type, root mean square of differences were 0.22, 0.24, 0.25, and 0.26% PC, depending on instrument. Corrected for bias within the test set, standard errors became 0.22, 0.18, 0.21, and 0.24% PC, respectively. These values were approximately twice the estimated lower limit for error (representing sample inhomogeneity). Overall repeatability relative standard deviation (RSD,) values were 0.92, 0.36, 0.42, and 0.74%, respectively. Overall reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values were 1.15, 0.61,1.53, and 1.38%. Such values for within-laboratory and between-laboratory variations of the near- IR methods were equivalent to values reported for the combustion method (990.03) for wheat. An inhouse study that examined all 6 U.S. wheat classes with one of the 4 instrument types produced repeatability and reproducibility values similar to those of the collaborative study, suggesting that the near-IR technique may be applied to red, white, hard, soft, and durum wheats. The near-IR method for determination of PC of whole-grain wheat has been adopted First Action (997.06) by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology,Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Chemistry,Food Science,Analytical Chemistry

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3