Efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant temozolomide compared to standard adjuvant temozolomide in glioblastoma: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Gupta Tejpal1ORCID,Talukdar Riddhijyoti1,Kannan Sadhana2,Dasgupta Archya1ORCID,Chatterjee Abhishek1,Patil Vijay3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI) , Mumbai , India

2. Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI) , Mumbai , India

3. Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI) , Mumbai , India

Abstract

Abstract Background This study was designed to compare outcomes of extended adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) vs standard adjuvant TMZ following radiotherapy (RT) plus concurrent TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma after concurrent RT/TMZ to 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (control arm) or extended (>6 cycles) adjuvant TMZ (experimental arm) were eligible. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival, while progression-free survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Hazard ratio (HR) for progression and death with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for individual primary study and pooled using random-effects model. Toxicity was defined as proportion of patients with ≥grade 3 hematologic toxicity and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Any P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Systematic literature review identified five randomized controlled trials comparing standard (6 cycles) vs extended (>6 cycles) adjuvant TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Outcome data could be extracted from 358 patients from four primary studies. Extended adjuvant TMZ was not associated with statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.10; P = .18) or death (HR = 0.87, 95% CI:0.60-1.27; P = .48) compared to standard adjuvant TMZ. Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity though somewhat higher with extended adjuvant TMZ, was not significantly different between the two arms (RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.83-4.87; P = .12). Conclusions There is low-certainty evidence that extended adjuvant TMZ is not associated with significant survival benefit or increased hematologic toxicity in unselected patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma compared to standard adjuvant TMZ.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference30 articles.

1. Statistical report: CBTRUS: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2013–2017;Ostrom;Neuro Oncol.,2020

2. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma;Stupp;N Eng J Med.,2005

3. Ongoing improvements in postoperative survival of glioblastoma in the temozolomide era: a population-based data linkage study;Johnston;Neurooncol Pract.,2020

4. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma;Hegi;N Eng J Med.,2005

5. Characterizing benefit from temozolomide in MGMT promoter unmethylated and methylated glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Alnahhas;Neurooncol Adv.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3