Statistics support and anxiety explored

Author:

Marshall Ellen1ORCID,Riach Anna2ORCID,Shaker Amanda3,Rowlett Peter1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sheffield Hallam University Department of Engineering and Mathematics, , Sheffield Hallam S1 1WB, UK

2. University of Leeds School of Biology, , Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

3. La Trobe University Department of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, , Plenty Rd, Bundoora, 3086, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Most higher education institutions in the UK now offer some form of additional individual support for mathematics and statistics. Whilst numerous studies have shown mathematics support can improve grades and reduce failure rates, there is a lack of research on other outcomes of interest such as anxiety or confidence, and very little research relating specifically to statistics support. This study uses quantitative and qualitative results from student questionnaires to evaluate the effectiveness of support in reducing anxiety and increasing confidence immediately after the first statistics support session and in the longer term. Comparisons of and preferences for online or face-to-face sessions and other aspects relating to anxiety were also explored. Key quantitative findings include a significant reduction in statistics anxiety after only one session of statistics support and a long-term increase in confidence with statistics. When asked how support impacts on anxiety or confidence, key themes emerging included feeling comfortable asking questions in statistics support, tailoring to individual needs and confirmation of understanding. The majority of students preferred face-to-face sessions over online particularly those with higher levels of statistics anxiety. Although differences were generally not significant, higher levels of anxiety were observed before online sessions and greater changes in anxiety occurred during face-to-face sessions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference70 articles.

1. The provision of mathematics and statistics support in Scottish higher education institutions (2017): a comparative study by the Scottish mathematics support network;Ahmed;MSOR connections,2018

2. A comparison of mathematics anxiety and statistics anxiety in relation to general anxiety;Baloglu,1999

3. An innovative approach to evaluating the University’s Mathematics Learning Centre;Carroll;Teach. Math. Appl.,2012

4. Cognitive and non-cognitive factors related to students’ statistics achievement;Chiesi;Stat. Educ. Res. J.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3