Affiliation:
1. Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO 80523 , USA
2. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station , Fort Collins, CO , USA
Abstract
Abstract
This qualitative case study evaluates manager and researcher perceptions of the impact of a place-based, collaborative knowledge co-development process and examines the outcomes of that co-development for changes to management approaches. The USDA Forest Service (Forest Service) Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report 373 (GTR-373) is a codeveloped science synthesis that functions as a boundary object providing a framework for planning, designing, and implementing management action for restoration of ponderosa and dry mixed-conifer forests. The process of creating and socializing the GTR-373 framework fostered continual knowledge exchange and engagement between researchers and managers across different organizations and levels of decision-making. This built trust in the information, improved justification for management action, developed a common foundation for cross-boundary implementation, and increased communication. The framework has been applied across jurisdictions and has been used as a foundational tool for training staff and designing projects. However, adapting the GTR-373 framework across scales remains challenging.
Study Implications: This qualitative case study evaluates a co-development process in which researchers and managers from multiple organizations and agencies collaborated to produce a science-informed restoration framework to support forest management on the Colorado Front Range (GTR-373). The process built trust, improved justification for management action, developed a common foundation for implementation, and increased communication. However, cross-boundary management across spatial scales remains challenging, and managers interpret information through organizational mandates and site-specific context. Sustained collaboration between researchers and land managers can help make science actionable and relevant at the appropriate scale for planning and management across expertise and jurisdictional boundaries.
Funder
Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act
USDA
Colorado Forest Restoration Institute
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference68 articles.
1. “Unpacking the ‘Information Barrier’: Comparing Perspectives on Information as a Barrier to Climate Change Adaptation in the Interior Mountain West.”;Archie,2014
2. “Co-Management and the Co-Production of Knowledge: Learning to Adapt in Canada’s Arctic.”;Armitage,2011
3. “Engaging with Stakeholders to Produce Actionable Science: A Framework and Guidance.”;Bamzai-Dodson,2021