A Qualitative Assessment to Inform Strategic Improvement of Research and Development within the USDA Forest Service

Author:

Greiner S Michelle1ORCID,Schultz Courtney1,Anderson Nathaniel2

Affiliation:

1. Public Lands Policy Group, Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University , 1472 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1472 , USA

2. Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service , Missoula, MT , USA

Abstract

Abstract Past reviews of the USDA Forest Service (Forest Service) Research and Development (R&D) branch have identified several persistent challenges, including unclear strategic direction and a need for greater communication with end users. We conducted research focused on the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) of R&D to understand current perceptions about the station’s efficacy and strategic direction as well as its engagement with partners both inside and outside of Forest Service. We conducted fifty-eight interviews with Forest Service and RMRS leaders, scientists, and partners. Interviewees said national research priorities are unclear, and there is tension between conducting basic and applied science. Nonscientist partners said they depend on RMRS for scientific expertise. Interviewees recommended clarifying research priorities, improving leadership and communication both inside and outside of the agency, investing more in science communication, and strengthening incentives to conduct applied research. These station-level results provide insight into improvements that could be made to enhance R&D’s ability to pursue its mission.

Funder

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Rocky Mountain Research Station

U.S. Forest Service

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Plant Science,Forestry

Reference26 articles.

1. “A How-to Guide for Co-production of Actionable Science.”;Beier;Conservation Letters,2017

2. “Too Many Things to Do: How to Deal with the Dysfunctions of Multiple-Goal Agencies.”;Biber;Harvard Environmental Law Review,2009

3. Money Trees: The Douglas Fir and American Forestry, 1900-1944

4. “To Bridge the Divide between Evidence and Policy: Reduce Ambiguity as Much as Uncertainty.”;Cairney;Public Administration Review,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3