Antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Author:

Benz Alexander P12ORCID,Johansson Isabelle1,Dewilde Willem J M3,Lopes Renato D4,Mehran Roxana5ORCID,Sartori Samantha5ORCID,Sarafoff Nikolaus6,Yasuda Satoshi7,McIntyre William F1,Healey Jeff S1,Shoamanesh Ashkan1,Eikelboom John W1,Connolly Stuart J1

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton St. E., Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada

2. Department of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany

3. Department of Cardiology, Imeldaziekenhuis, Imeldalaan 9, 2820 Bonheiden, Belgium

4. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 200 Morris St., Durham, NC 27701, USA

5. The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA

6. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz-und Kreislauferkrankungen, Technische Universität, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636 Munich, Germany

7. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Aims  The aim of this study was to systematically assess the effects of antiplatelets on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), treated and not-treated with oral anticoagulation. Methods and results  We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception until September 2020. From 5446 citations, we selected randomized trials allocating patients with AF to antiplatelet therapy vs. control. We applied random-effects models for meta-analysis and assessed potential effect modification with background anticoagulation use. Eighteen trials including 21 518 participants met our prespecified eligibility criteria. In 10 studies without background anticoagulation, antiplatelets reduced all-cause stroke [486/6165 (events/patients) vs. 621/6061; risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.86, I2 = 0%]. In eight studies with background anticoagulation, there was a signal for an increase in all-cause stroke with antiplatelets (97/4608 vs. 72/4684; RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.98–1.79, I2 = 0%, P-value for interaction <0.001). A similar pattern emerged for ischaemic stroke. Irrespective of background anticoagulation use, antiplatelets increased major bleeding (509/10 402 vs. 328/10 496; RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.35–1.77, I2 = 0%) and intracranial haemorrhage (107/10 221 vs. 65/10 232; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20–2.24, I2 = 0%), and reduced myocardial infarction (201/9679 vs. 260/9751; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.94, I2 = 0%, all P-values for interaction ≥0.36). Antiplatelets did not affect mortality (1221/10 299 vs. 1211/10 287; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.17, I2 = 29%, P-value for interaction = 0.23). Conclusions  In patients with AF not receiving oral anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy modestly reduced stroke. There was a corresponding signal for harm when used on top of anticoagulation. Irrespective of background anticoagulation use, antiplatelet therapy significantly increased bleeding, moderately reduced myocardial infarction, and did not affect mortality.

Funder

German Heart Foundation

Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation

Stockholm County Council

Canadian Institutes for Health Research

Marta and Owen Boris Foundation and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3