Antithrombotic therapy and cardiovascular outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients without indications for chronic oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Guedeney Paul1,Roule Vincent2,Mesnier Jules34,Chapelle Celine56,Portal Jean-Jacques7,Laporte Silvy56,Ollier Edouard56,Zeitouni Michel1,Kerneis Mathieu1ORCID,Procopi Niki1ORCID,Barthelemy Olivier1ORCID,Sorrentino Sabato8,Mihalovic Michal9,Silvain Johanne1,Vicaut Eric7,Montalescot Gilles1ORCID,Collet Jean-Philippe1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, Institut de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital , Paris 75013 , France

2. Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Caen Normandie, Normandie Univ, UMR_S 1166 , Caen , France

3. French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials (FACT) , , Paris , France

4. Université de Paris, INSERM Unité-1148, and Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris , , Paris , France

5. Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation et Pharmacologie , , Saint-Etienne , France

6. CHU de Saint-Etienne , , Saint-Etienne , France

7. Unité de Recherche Clinique, Lariboisière Hospital (AP-HP), ACTION Study Group , Paris , France

8. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Magna Graecia University , Catanzaro , Italy

9. Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady , Prague , Czech Republic

Abstract

AbstractAimsAs the antithrombotic regimen that may best prevent ischaemic complications along with the lowest bleeding risk offset following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic regimens in patients without having an indication for chronic oral anticoagulation.Methods and resultsWe conducted a PROSPERO-registered (CRD42021247924) systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating post-TAVI antithrombotic regimens up to April 2022. We estimated the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a random-effects model in a frequentist pairwise and network metanalytic approach. We included seven studies comprising 4006 patients with a mean weighted follow-up of 12.9 months. Risk of all-cause death was significantly reduced with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with low-dose rivaroxaban + 3-month single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.88), while no significant reduction was observed with SAPT vs. DAPT (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67–1.58) and SAPT and DAPT compared with apixaban or edoxaban (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.32–1.14 and RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.34–1.02, respectively). SAPT was associated with a significant reduction of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding compared with DAPT (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29–0.70), apixaban or edoxaban alone (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25–0.79), and low-dose rivaroxaban + 3-month SAPT (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.57). There were no differences between the various regimens with respect to myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism.ConclusionFollowing TAVI in patients without an indication for chronic oral anticoagulant, SAPT more than halved the risk of bleeding compared with DAPT and direct oral anticoagulant-based regimens without significant ischaemic offset.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Antithrombotic therapy in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a network meta-analysis;European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy;2023-12-11

2. Sex, Antithrombotics, and Outcomes After TAVR;JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions;2023-05

3. Antithrombotic therapy after TAVI: Better alone than with a bad company;Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions;2023-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3