Furthering the Dialogue Between Religious Studies and Theology: An Apophatic Approach as a Heuristic Tool for Methodological Agnosticism

Author:

Tolstaya Katya1,Bestebreurtje Frank2

Affiliation:

1. Theology and Religion in Post-Trauma Societies, Institute for the Academic Study of Eastern Christianity, Faculty of Religion and Theology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Schapensteeg 25, 8261 BH Kampen, The Netherlands

2. Institute for the Academic Study of Eastern Christianity, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Venestraat 24, 8261 KE Kampen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Debates on the relation between theology and religious studies ultimately revolve around epistemological questions: What are the respective limits of religious and academic knowledge and reasoning, and along what boundaries can they meet? This contribution argues that the “reality of religion” is the shared subject matter of these disciplines. For methodological purposes, a distinction is made between two poles: the “transcendent frame” of theology, which defines the reality of religion with reference to transcendence, and the “immanent frame” of religious studies, which defines the reality of religion with reference to the empirical or immanent and in which transcendence is “bracketed.” A qualified methodological agnosticism that considers the bounds of knowledge can further the dialogue between theology and religious studies on the status of transcendence. The theological apophatic method, which departs from a sense of not-knowing and the limits of human knowledge, can serve as a heuristic tool.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Religious studies

Reference74 articles.

1. “Introduction.”;Alles,2008

2. “Critical Responses to Phenomenological Theories of Religion: What Kind of Category is “Religion”?”;Arnal,2017

3. “Plotting Belonging: Interrogating Insider and Outsider Status in Faith Research.”;Aston;Diskus: The Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions,2015

4. “Performative Utterances.”;Austin,2001

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3