Towards ‘bogus employment?’ The contradictory outcomes of ride-hailing regulation in Berlin, Lisbon and Paris

Author:

Niebler Valentin12ORCID,Pirina Giorgio3ORCID,Secchi Michelangelo4ORCID,Tomassoni Franco5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for European Ethnology (IfEE), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Mohrenstraße 40-41, 10117 Berlin , Germany

2. Berlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Mohrenstraße 40-41, 10117 Berlin , Germany

3. Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice , Dorsoduro 3484/D, 30123 Venezia , Italy

4. Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano , Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan , Italy

5. Collaborative Laboratory for Labour, Employment and Social Protection (CoLABOR) , Rua das Taipas 1, 1250-264 Lisbon , Portugal

Abstract

Abstract The issue of employment classification has been central in the politics around the platform economy. Crucial has been the phenomenon of ‘bogus self-employment’, whereby workers in de facto dependent employment relationships conduct services as independent contractors. Legislators around the world have aimed to tackle this issue by obliging platforms to classify their workers as employees. Based on empirical research in the ride-hailing industry of Berlin, Paris and Lisbon, where such classification exists already, we highlight its contradictory outcomes. We argue that platform companies have managed to introduce forms of ‘bogus employment’ whereby even formally employed workers lack basic worker rights.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference59 articles.

1. At a crossroads: Uber and the ambiguities of the COVID-19 emergency in Lisbon;Allegretti;Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation,2021

2. Platform work in Europe: lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead;Aloisi;European Labour Law Journal,2022

3. Mobile workers, contingent labour: migration, the gig economy and the multiplication of labour;Altenried;In Environ Plan A,2021

4. Platform labour: contingent histories and new technologies;Altenried;Soft Power Journal Revista euro-americana de teorìa e historia de la politica y del derecho,2020

5. The ordinary city;Amin;Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,1997

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3