Noncommunicating acute type A aortic dissection in elderly patients: Surgery versus medical management

Author:

Nakamae Kosuke1ORCID,Oshitomi Takashi1ORCID,Uesugi Hideyuki1ORCID,Ideta Ichiro1,Takaji Kentaro1ORCID,Sassa Toshiharu1,Murata Hidetaka1,Hirota Masataka1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital , Kumamoto, Japan

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to evaluate the surgical and conservative outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection with a thrombosed false lumen of the ascending aorta in elderly patients. METHODS Patients older than 75 years with acute type A aortic dissection admitted to our hospital from October 2011 to December 2020 were reviewed retrospectively, including those with the noncommunicating type without malperfusion and low physical capacity prehospitalization. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were enrolled consecutively in the medical (M, n = 30) and surgical (S, n = 36) groups. The ascending aorta was the most replaced section in the S group (78%). Groups did not differ significantly in hospital deaths and in intensive care unit and hospital stays. Two patients (7%) underwent surgery and 3 (10%) underwent redissection in the M group. No significant difference existed between the groups in the decline of physical performance during hospitalization. Seven patients in the M group (24%) had aorta-related events in the late period as opposed to none in the S group (P=0.003). Survival rates after 4 years were 78.3% and 71.4% in the S and M groups, respectively (P=0.154). The cumulative incidence of overall reintervention due to an aortic event was significantly higher in the M group; however, the 2 groups did not differ significantly in overall aorta-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS Surgical outcomes of noncommunicating acute type A aortic dissection in elderly patients were favorable. There was no significant difference in maintaining physical function at discharge, and the medical group had a significantly higher overall aortic event rate than the surgical group.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3