Initial thickness of the crescent may not be a reliable predictor of complications in type A intramural haematoma

Author:

Kitamura Tadashi1ORCID,Shikata Fumiaki1,Torii Shinzo1,Mishima Toshiaki1,Fukuzumi Masaomi1,Motoji Yusuke1,Tamura Yoshimi1,Kaneda Sakura1,Ishiwaki Daiki1,Miyaji Kagami1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine , Kanagawa, Japan

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate changes in haematoma thickness during the early period and their association with disease progression in patients who received initial medical treatment for type A intramural haematoma (IMH). METHODS Medical records and serial computed tomography angiography (CTA) images of patients who did not undergo emergency aortic repair for type A IMH upon presentation were retrospectively reviewed. The haematoma remodelling rate was determined using the following equation: thickness of the haematoma on the first CTA (mm) - thickness of the haematoma on the second CTA (mm)time between the first and second CTAs (h). RESULTS Among the 40 patients included in this study, 38 were indicated for initial watch-and-wait strategy, whereas 2 were indicated for emergency aortic repair but declined it. During hospitalization, 10 patients developed disease progression, with 2 in-hospital mortality cases. Analysis of the haematoma remodelling rate in 39 patients revealed that such a rate was significantly associated with the reciprocal of the time from onset. Analysis of all 70 CTA examinations performed within 24 h after the onset of IMH showed that haematoma thickness was significantly associated with the logarithm of the time from onset. Initial regression of the haematoma was not necessarily associated with avoidance of disease progression. CONCLUSIONS In type A IMH, the thickness of the haematoma in the ascending aorta tended to decrease in the very early period; however, prompt regression of the haematoma was not necessarily associated with avoidance of disease progression.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3