A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in thoracic surgery

Author:

Seastedt Kenneth P1ORCID,Moukheiber Dana2,Mahindre Saurabh A3,Thammineni Chaitanya4ORCID,Rosen Darin T5,Watkins Ammara A1ORCID,Hashimoto Daniel A6,Hoang Chuong D7ORCID,Kpodonu Jacques8ORCID,Celi Leo A9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

2. Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

3. Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

4. HILS Laboratory, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

5. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

6. Surgical AI & Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

7. Thoracic Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

8. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

9. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Machine learning (ML) has great potential, but there are few examples of its implementation improving outcomes. The thoracic surgeon must be aware of pertinent ML literature and how to evaluate this field for the safe translation to patient care. This scoping review provides an introduction to ML applications specific to the thoracic surgeon. We review current applications, limitations and future directions. METHODS A search of the PubMed database was conducted with inclusion requirements being the use of an ML algorithm to analyse patient information relevant to a thoracic surgeon and contain sufficient details on the data used, ML methods and results. Twenty-two papers met the criteria and were reviewed using a methodological quality rubric. RESULTS ML demonstrated enhanced preoperative test accuracy, earlier pathological diagnosis, therapies to maximize survival and predictions of adverse events and survival after surgery. However, only 4 performed external validation. One demonstrated improved patient outcomes, nearly all failed to perform model calibration and one addressed fairness and bias with most not generalizable to different populations. There was a considerable variation to allow for reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS There is promise but also challenges for ML in thoracic surgery. The transparency of data and algorithm design and the systemic bias on which models are dependent remain issues to be addressed. Although there has yet to be widespread use in thoracic surgery, it is essential thoracic surgeons be at the forefront of the eventual safe introduction of ML to the clinic and operating room.

Funder

National Institute of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3