Aortic valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement for root aneurysm: the CAVIAAR multicentric study

Author:

Lansac Emmanuel1,Di Centa Isabelle2,Danial Pichoy1ORCID,Bouchot Olivier3,Arnaud-Crozat Eric4,Hacini Rachid4,Doguet Fabien5ORCID,Demaria Roland6,Verhoye Jean Philippe7,Jouan Jerome8,Chatel Didier9,Lopez Stephane10,Folliguet Thierry11,Leprince Pascal1,Langanay Thierry7,Latremouille Christian12,Fayad Georges13,Fleury Jean Philippe14,Monin Jean Luc15,Mankoubi Leila15,Noghin Milena15,Berrebi Alain15,Pousset Sarah15,Laubriet-Jazayeri Aline3,Lafourcade Alexandre16,Marcault Estelle17,Kindo Michel18,Payot Laurent19,Bergoend Eric11ORCID,Hoffart Cecile Jourdain20,Debauchez Mathieu1,Tubach Florence21

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU Pitié Salpetriere , Paris, France

2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Hopital Foch , Suresnes, France

3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU Le Bocage , Dijon, France

4. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU A. Michallon , La Tronche, France

5. Department of Cardiac Surgery, C.H.U Charles Nicolle , Rouen, France

6. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU A. De Villeneuve , Montpellier, France

7. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU Pontchaillou , Rennes, France

8. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU Limoges , France

9. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Clinique Saint Gatien , Tours, France

10. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Institut Arnault Tzanck , Saint Laurent Du Var, France

11. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU Mondor , Créteil, France

12. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou , Paris, France

13. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille , Lille, France

14. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Clinique Belledone , Saint Martin d’Hères, France

15. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montouris , Paris, France

16. AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), INSERM, CIC-1422 , Paris, France

17. APHP, Hôpital Bichat, Département d’Epidémiologie et Recherche Clinique, F-75018 Paris INSERM CIC-EC 1425 , Paris, France

18. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHU de Strasbourg , Strasbourg, France

19. Cardiology, Saint Brieuc Hospital , Saint Brieuc, France

20. APHP, Département de la Recherche Clinique et du Développement (DRCD) Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et d’Innovation—GIRCI Ile-de-France Hôpital Saint Louis , France

21. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1422 , Paris, France

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Despite growing evidence that aortic valve repair improves long-term patient outcomes and quality of life, aortic valves are mostly replaced. We evaluate the effect of aortic valve repair versus replacement in patients with dystrophic aortic root aneurysm up to 4 years. METHODS The multicentric CAVIAAR (Conservation Aortique Valvulaire dans les Insuffisances Aortiques et les Anévrismes de la Racine aortique) prospective cohort study enrolled 261 patients: 130 underwent standardized aortic valve repair (REPAIR) consisting of remodelling root repair with expansible aortic ring annuloplasty, and 131 received mechanical composite valve and graft replacement (REPLACE). Primary outcome was a composite criterion of mortality, reoperation, thromboembolic or major bleeding events, endocarditis or operating site infections, pacemaker implantation and heart failure, analysed with propensity score-weighted Cox model analysis. Secondary outcomes included major adverse valve-related events and components of primary outcome. RESULTS The mean age was 56.1 years, and valve was bicuspid in 115 patients (44.7%). Up to 4 years, REPAIR did not significantly differ from REPLACE in terms of primary outcome [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.66 (0.39; 1.12)] but showed significantly less valve-related deaths (HR 0.09 [0.02; 0.34]) and major bleeding events (HR 0.37 [0.16; 0.85]) without an increased risk of valve-related reoperation (HR 2.10 [0.64; 6.96]). When accounting for the occurrence of multiple events in a single patient, the REPAIR group had half the occurrence of major adverse valve-related events (HR 0.51 [0.31; 0.86]). CONCLUSIONS Although the primary outcome did not significantly differ between the REPAIR and REPLACE groups, the trend is in favour of REPAIR by a significant reduction of valve-related deaths and major bleeding events. Long-term follow-up beyond 4 years is needed to confirm these findings.

Funder

French Ministry of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3