Mid-term outcome of surgical treatment in patients with aorto-left ventricular tunnel

Author:

Liang Yu1,Wang Jingjin1,Li Dianyuan2,Wan Linyuan1,Gao Yiming1,Liu Rui3,Li Shoujun3,Wang Hao1,Pang Kunjing1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Echocardiography, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China

3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with aorto-left ventricular tunnel and to investigate what kind of patient cohort is more likely to have adverse events. METHODS Twenty-one patients with a median age of 6.58 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.17–24.50] years who received surgical treatment of aorto-left ventricular tunnel from March 2002 to December 2019 were reviewed. The median follow-up time was 64.50 (IQR 25.15–120.50) months. Clinical characteristics, surgical methods and follow-up outcomes were summarized in separate groups of patients with or without preoperative aortic valve (AoV) issues. Composite adverse events were defined as death or requirement of reoperation. Time-related analysis of freedom from death and requirement of reoperation was performed with the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS The average tunnel size was 8.68 (standard deviation: 3.62) mm. The most common and the most important associated lesions were AoV lesions. Tunnels in 20 patients were closed with direct sutures or a patch. For 1 patient with an irreparable AoV, the tunnel was cut open simultaneously with aortic valve replacement and aortic root plasty. In the group of patients with preoperative AoV issues, 4 patients received aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic valves and 6 patients received aortic valvuloplasty repair. The follow-up outcomes differed significantly between groups (the incidence of death was 15.38% and the incidence of requiring a reoperation was 46.15% in patients with preoperative AoV issues). In the group without preoperative AoV issues, there were no deaths and no reoperations (Fisher’s exact test; P = 0.018). The probability of freedom from death and of the requirement for reoperation between the 2 groups was not significantly different (log-rank, P = 0.09). Overall, the estimated probability of freedom from death and requirement of reoperation was 77.30% (standard error: 10.20%) [95% confidence interval (CI): 49.53–91.00] at 5 years, 67.64% (standard error: 12.70%) (95% CI: 36.71–85.84) at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Patients with aorto-left ventricular tunnel with preoperative AoV issues are more prone to die or to require a reoperation. In contrast, patients without preoperative AoV issues can be free from death or reoperation for a longer period of time. Patients with preoperative AoV issues need much stricter postoperative long-term echocardiographic follow-up.

Funder

Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference16 articles.

1. Aortico-left ventricular tunnel;Levy;Circulation,1963

2. Aortico-left ventricular tunnel: 35-year experience;Martins;J Am Coll Cardiol,2004

3. Surgical treatment of aortico-left ventricular tunnel: a 12-year experience;Li;Cardiology,2009

4. Congenital aortico-left ventricular tunnel: a case report of a rare cause of aortic regurgitation in adults;Khajali;J Tehran Heart Cent,2017

5. Aortico-left ventricular tunnel: late follow-up;Meldrum-Hanna;Ann Thorac Surg,1986

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3