Use of Aprotinin versus Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery Patients with High-Risk for Excessive Bleeding (APACHE) trial: a multicentre retrospective comparative non-randomized historical study

Author:

Gallo Eloïse1,Gaudard Philippe2ORCID,Provenchère Sophie3,Souab Fouzia4,Schwab Anaïs5,Bedague Damien6,de La Barre Hugues7,de Tymowski Christian3,Saadi Laysa2,Rozec Bertrand4,Cholley Bernard7,Scherrer Bruno8,Fellahi Jean-Luc5,Ouattara Alexandre1ORCID,Imbault Julien,Cadier Gaspard,Beurton Antoine,Mion Stefano,Besnard Thibaud,Voulgaropoulos Julia,Gouezel Corentin,Mellano Vincent,Portefaix Hadrien,Pambet Hadrien,Fohlen Baptiste,Zlotnik Diane,Veli Manuela,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Anaesthesia and Critical Care, CHU Bordeaux , France

2. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital , Montpellier, France

3. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital , Paris, France

4. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hôpital Laennec, CHU Nantes , France

5. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon , France

6. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital , France

7. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou , Paris, France

8. Bruno Scherrer Conseil , Saint Arnoult en Yvelines, France

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Following the reintroduction of aprotinin into the European market, the French Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesiologists recommended its prophylactic use at half-dose for high-risk cardiac surgery patients. We examined whether the use of aprotinin instead of tranexamic acid could significantly reduce severe perioperative bleeding. METHODS This multicentre, retrospective, historical study included cardiac surgery patients treated with aprotinin or tranexamic acid between December 2017 and September 2020. The primary efficacy end point was the severe or massive perioperative bleeding (class 3–4 of the universal definition of perioperative bleeding). The safety secondary end points included the occurrence of thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS Among the 693 patients included in the study, 347 received aprotinin and 346 took tranexamic acid. The percentage of patients with severe or massive bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (42.1% vs 43.6%, Adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.62–1.23, P = 0.44), as was the perioperative need for blood products (81.0% vs 83.2%, ORadj = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.48–1.17, P = 0.20). However, the median (Interquartile range) 12 h postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin group (383 ml [241–625] vs 450 ml [290–730], P < 0.01). Compared to tranexamic acid, the intraoperative use of aprotinin was associated with increased risk for thromboembolic events (adjusted Hazard ratio 2.30 [95% Cl: 1.06–5.30]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Given the modest reduction in blood loss at the expense of a significant increase in thromboembolic adverse events, aprotinin use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients should be based on a carefully considered benefit–risk assessment.

Funder

French Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesiologists

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3