Mini-extracorporeal circulation surgery produces less inflammation than off-pump coronary surgery

Author:

Permanyer Eduard12ORCID,Munoz-Guijosa Christian3ORCID,Padró Josep-Maria2,Ginel Antonino2ORCID,Montiel José2,Sánchez-Quesada José Luis4,Vila Luis5,Camacho Mercedes56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Quironsalud Teknon Heart Institute, Barcelona, Spain

2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Research Institute Hospital Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain

4. Cardiovascular Research Group, CIBERDEM, Research Institute Hospital Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

5. Laboratory of Angiology, Vascular Biology and Inflammation, Research Institute Hospital Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

6. Genomics of Complex Diseases, Research Institute Hospital Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Both off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (OPCABG) and mini-extracorporeal circulation (MECC) have been associated with lower morbidity and mortality and less inflammation than conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. However, studies comparing the 2 techniques are scarce and the results are controversial. We compared the clinical outcomes and inflammatory response of low-risk patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting with MECC versus OPCABG. METHODS We conducted a prospective, randomized study in patients undergoing coronary heart surgery. Two hundred and thirty consecutive low-risk patients were randomly assigned to either receive OPCABG (n = 117) or MECC (n = 113). Clinical outcomes and postoperative biochemical results were analysed in both groups. We also analysed 19 circulating inflammatory markers in a subgroup of 40 patients at 4 perioperative time points. The area under the curve for each marker was calculated to monitor differences in the inflammatory response. RESULTS No significant differences were found between groups regarding perioperative clinical complications and no deaths occurred during the trial. Plasma levels in 9 of the 19 inflammatory markers were undetectable or showed no temporal variation, 3 were higher in the MECC group [interleukin (IL)-10, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β and epidermal growth factor] and 7 were higher in the OPCABG group (growth regulator oncogene, IL-6, IL-8, soluble CD40 ligand, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 and tumour necrosis factor-α). Differences in 2 proinflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, between the 2 surgical procedures were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS No clinical differences were observed between in low-risk patients undergoing MECC or OPCABG surgery, but OPCABG was associated with an increased release of proinflammatory cytokines compared with MECC. Studies in larger cohorts and in patients at higher risk are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical trial registration number NCT02118025.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference30 articles.

1. Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update;Paparella;Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2002

2. Humoral immune response during coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison of limited approach, “off-pump” technique and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass;Diegeler;Circulation,2000

3. Off-pump bypass graft operation significantly reduces oxidative stress and inflammation;Matata;Ann Thorac Surg,2000

4. Comparison of m-RNA expression for inflammatory mediators in leukocytes between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting;Okubo;Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2003

5. Reduced expression of systemic proinflammatory cytokines after off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting;Schulze;Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3