Biologic versus synthetic prosthesis for chest wall reconstruction: a matched analysis
Author:
Vanstraelen Stijn1, Bains Manjit S1, Dycoco Joe1, Adusumilli Prasad S1, Bott Matthew J1, Downey Robert J1, Huang James1, Isbell James M1ORCID, Molena Daniela1, Park Bernard J1, Rusch Valerie W1, Sihag Smita1, Allen Robert J2, Cordeiro Peter G2, Coriddi Michelle R2, Dayan Joseph H2, Disa Joseph J2, Matros Evan2, McCarthy Colleen M2, Nelson Jonas A2, Stern Carrie2, Shahzad Farooq2, Mehrara Babak2, Jones David R1, Rocco Gaetano1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA 2. Plastic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between biologic and synthetic reconstructions after chest wall resection in a matched cohort.
METHODS
All patients who underwent reconstruction after full-thickness chest wall resection from 2000 to 2022 were reviewed and stratified by prosthesis type (biologic or synthetic). Biologic prostheses were of biologic origin or were fully absorbable and incorporable. Integer matching was performed to reduce confounding. The study end point was surgical site complications requiring reoperation. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify associated risk factors.
RESULTS
In total, 438 patients underwent prosthetic chest wall reconstruction (unmatched: biologic, n = 49; synthetic, n = 389; matched: biologic, n = 46; synthetic, n = 46). After matching, the median (interquartile range) defect size was 83 cm2 (50–142) for the biologic group and 90 cm2 (48–146) for the synthetic group (P = 0.97). Myocutaneous flaps were used in 33% of biologic reconstructions (n = 15) and 33% of synthetic reconstructions (n = 15) in the matched cohort (P = 0.99). The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic reconstructions in the unmatched (3 [6%] vs 29 [7%]; P = 0.99) and matched (2 [4%] vs 4 [9%]; P = 0.68) cohorts. On the multivariable analysis, operative time [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00–1.01; P = 0.006] and operative blood loss (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI, 1.00–1.00]; P = 0.012) were associated with higher rates of surgical site complications requiring reoperation; microvascular free flaps (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.00–0.42; P = 0.024) were associated with lower rates.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of surgical site complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between biologic and synthetic prostheses in chest wall reconstructions.
Funder
National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Brustwandrekonstruktion: biologisches oder synthetisches Material?;Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie;2024-06 2. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh in chest-wall reconstruction: A 27-year experience;The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery;2024-06 3. Is there an ‘ideal’ material for chest wall reconstruction?;European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;2023-11-28
|
|