Outcomes of heart transplants in children with heterotaxy syndrome

Author:

Alsoufi Bahaaldin1,Kozik Deborah1,Lambert Andrea Nicole2,Deshpande Shriprasad3,Sparks Joshua D2,Trivedi Jaimin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Norton Children’s Hospital, University of Louisville , Louisville, KY, USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children’s Hospital, University of Louisville , Louisville, KY, USA

3. Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Critical Care, Children’s National Hospital , Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES End-stage congenital heart disease (CHD) in children with heterotaxy syndrome might necessitate a heart transplant (HTx). An HTx in heterotaxy patients can be associated with several technical (e.g. redo, systemic/pulmonary-venous/situs anomalies, pulmonary artery reconstruction) and extra-cardiac (e.g. ciliary dyskinesia, infections, gastrointestinal) challenges. Our goal was to determine if heterotaxy syndrome is associated with increased early or late transplant risks. METHODS The United Network for Organ Sharing transplant database was merged with the Paediatric Health Information System administrative database to identify children with heterotaxy who received an HTx. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between children with heterotaxy and contemporaneous non-heterotaxy congenital and non-congenital cardiomyopathy control groups. RESULTS After we merged the databases, we divided our cohort of 1122 patients into 3 groups: the heterotaxy (n = 143), group the non-heterotaxy congenital (n = 428) group and the cardiomyopathy (n = 551) group. There were differences in the characteristics between the 3 groups, with the heterotaxy group being comparable to the non-heterotaxy congenital group. The waiting list duration was longer for the heterotaxy than for the non-heterotaxy congenital and cardiomyopathy groups (91 vs 63 vs 56 days, P < 0.001). Early post-transplant complications were similar for all groups except for operative mortality, which was 1% for the cardiomyopathy and 4% for the heterotaxy and non-heterotaxy congenital groups (P < 0.001). The post-transplant hospital stay was shorter for the cardiomyopathy (57 days) compared to the non-heterotaxy congenital (99 days) and heterotaxy (89 days) groups (P < 0.001). Whereas rejection prior to discharge was comparable between the heterotaxy and the CHD groups, it was higher at 1 year for the heterotaxy (22%) than for the non-heterotaxy congenital (19%) and cardiomyopathy (13%) groups (P < 0.001). Survival at 5 years was superior for the cardiomyopathy (87%) compared to the heterotaxy (69%) and non-heterotaxy congenital groups (78%) (P < 0.001). For the heterotaxy group, no risk factors affecting survival were identified on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the complexity, an HTx in selected children with heterotaxy is associated with good mid-term outcomes. Despite early results that are comparable to those of other patients with CHD, the increasing rejection rate at 1 year and the relatively accelerated attrition at mid-term warrant further follow-up. Due to database limitations in defining morphologic and surgical details, further work is warranted to delineate anatomical and surgical variables that could affect survival.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference19 articles.

1. Human laterality disorders: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management;Soofi;Am J Med Sci,2021

2. The nomenclature, definition and classification of cardiac structures in the setting of heterotaxy;Jacobs;Cardiol Young,2007

3. The heterotaxy syndrome: associated congenital heart defects and management;Agarwal;Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2021

4. Outcomes of multistage palliation of infants with functional single ventricle and heterotaxy syndrome;Alsoufi;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2016

5. Heterotaxy: lessons learned about patterns of practice and outcomes from the congenital heart surgery database of the society of thoracic surgeons;Jacobs;World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3